Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Y Is For Yoga, And For Young
Some people believe that running marathons will keep them young. Others think that abstaining from eating animal products will do the trick. Others join societies whose members eat almost nothing at all, in the hopes that this will enable them to live forever.
Me, I believe in yoga. Despite considerable evidence to the contrary, my gut tells me that as long as I can do a forward bend and place my hands flat on the floor, I will not be truly old. As long as I can sit in a half lotus, lean forward and touch my face to the mat, there is still hope. As long as I can pick up one foot and touch my nose with my toe, I'm o.k. If I could stand on my head--which I can't--that would guarantee immortality, but I'm not aiming for that.
I don't want to climb mountains or swim across straits or lift huge weights. All I want is for my arms and legs and hips and neck to continue making most of the gestures they made when they were three years old. All I want is to be able to control my limbs within the space of my yoga mat. This strikes me as a self-contained, reasonable, even humble goal.*
The fact that I have CFS imposes certain limits on my yoga practice--which is o.k., because if it didn't I'd be doing nothing but yoga all the time. The disease lets me do just about anything I want in class, but takes its revenge afterwards. If I indulge in one sun salutation too many, I can be nailed to the bed for a week.
Yoga has done some very good things for me. It was my flexibility going into hip-replacement surgery that allowed me to recover in record time and regain complete range of motion in the new hip (having a great surgeon helped, too). When I developed severe neck pains that traveled down my arm, doctors took x-rays and mumbled about pinched nerves, NSAIDs and physical therapy. But I remembered the yoga dictum to hold your head as if you were hanging from a golden chain attached to the top of your skull, chin tucked in and back of the neck extended, and behold, the pain went away.
Best of all, yoga has enabled me to have a conversation with my body, every part of it. Before yoga my feet were vague appendages flapping at the end of my legs. With yoga I have gotten to know them personally--heel and arch and all ten toes. After several years of practice, the weird things my teachers said about the breath finally began to make sense. Now if I'm told to breathe into my hip, I know exactly what to do. And I have learned, both literally and metaphorically, to listen to my gut, whose small, quiet voice had gone unheeded for my entire life.
*Buddhist Note: I realize that this wanting to control my body within the space of my yoga mat, etc. is a sign of attachment to outcomes, but I can't help it.
Labels:
Buddhism
,
CFS
,
staying young
,
yoga
Monday, October 31, 2011
Sustainable Entertainment
The first meeting of the Cabin Fever Abatement Salon took place yesterday afternoon, while the sun shone brightly on the new snow. A young woman, the farm manager at that pearl of West Pawlet, Consider Bardwell Farm, told the touching, often sad but ultimately victorious story of her father, a fifth-generation farmer, and his struggles to continue working on the land. It was clear as she spoke that in her own case the farming vocation has not, as so often happens, skipped a generation.
Afterwards, I sat by the fire rewarding myself with some leftover hummus and a glass of wine, and thought about those seventeenth-century Parisian ladies who, sick of rowdy parties where drunken noblemen got into fights, spat on the floor, and abused the servants, invented a kinder, gentler entertainment: the salon.
It should have been called not the salon but the chambre a coucher--the bedroom--for that was where the gatherings were held. The hostess lay on her bed (I never could find out whether she got under the covers), which was on a slightly elevated platform. The space between the bed and the wall, technically known as the ruelle, or little street, was occupied on one side by the servants standing ready to pour more of that exotic delicacy, le cafe, and on the other by her friends. Depending on the degree of their favor with the hostess, some friends sat on chairs, others on mere stools.
As the drafty palaces and spartan furniture of the 17th century gave way to the cozier interiors and welcoming armchairs of the 18th, the gatherings moved from the bedroom to the salon proper. Eventually, the in-home salon was replaced by the more democratic coffeehouse around the corner. But the custom of living room entertainments persisted until the early 20th century. The young lady playing the piano for her parents' dinner guests; the fledgeling poet reciting in a tremulous voice; the returning traveler astounding the company with stories of naked savages--all are examples of the human talent for making entertainment out of home-grown resources.
Then, with the advent of radio, the movies, television, and the shopping mall, people stopped looking to themselves and their friends for entertainment, and the salon was no more.
Now that foes both natural and man-made assail us on every side, self-reliance--that grandmotherly virtue--is once again looking like a good idea, even an attractive one. Some people are growing their own vegetables; some are making their own soap. Some discover that within their friends and neighbors lie rich deposits of wit, adventurousness, quirkiness and passion, just waiting to be exploited. And the quaint old salon, updated as locally-grown, sustainable entertainment, makes its long-deserved comeback.
Afterwards, I sat by the fire rewarding myself with some leftover hummus and a glass of wine, and thought about those seventeenth-century Parisian ladies who, sick of rowdy parties where drunken noblemen got into fights, spat on the floor, and abused the servants, invented a kinder, gentler entertainment: the salon.
It should have been called not the salon but the chambre a coucher--the bedroom--for that was where the gatherings were held. The hostess lay on her bed (I never could find out whether she got under the covers), which was on a slightly elevated platform. The space between the bed and the wall, technically known as the ruelle, or little street, was occupied on one side by the servants standing ready to pour more of that exotic delicacy, le cafe, and on the other by her friends. Depending on the degree of their favor with the hostess, some friends sat on chairs, others on mere stools.
As the drafty palaces and spartan furniture of the 17th century gave way to the cozier interiors and welcoming armchairs of the 18th, the gatherings moved from the bedroom to the salon proper. Eventually, the in-home salon was replaced by the more democratic coffeehouse around the corner. But the custom of living room entertainments persisted until the early 20th century. The young lady playing the piano for her parents' dinner guests; the fledgeling poet reciting in a tremulous voice; the returning traveler astounding the company with stories of naked savages--all are examples of the human talent for making entertainment out of home-grown resources.
Then, with the advent of radio, the movies, television, and the shopping mall, people stopped looking to themselves and their friends for entertainment, and the salon was no more.
Now that foes both natural and man-made assail us on every side, self-reliance--that grandmotherly virtue--is once again looking like a good idea, even an attractive one. Some people are growing their own vegetables; some are making their own soap. Some discover that within their friends and neighbors lie rich deposits of wit, adventurousness, quirkiness and passion, just waiting to be exploited. And the quaint old salon, updated as locally-grown, sustainable entertainment, makes its long-deserved comeback.
Labels:
17th-century Paris
,
Consider Bardwell Farm
,
country life
,
salons
,
sustainable living
Friday, October 28, 2011
X Is For Xenoglossophobia
If xenophobia means "fear of foreigners," xenoglossophobia means "fear of foreign languages." Like Lyme disease, xenoglossophobia is endemic in many parts of the U.S.
This fear causes many parents to want to protect their children from foreign language instruction, resulting in a dearth of public schools that offer bilingual immersion (only 440 in the entire country). In some states, programs that immerse children in another language are actually banned, because, a recent NPR report states (http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=141584947 ), "a majority of voters don't think children can learn proper English and at the same time hold on to a foreign language and culture."
Xenoglossophobes hold firmly to this view, despite a wealth of evidence that becoming not only bilingual but literate in a foreign language is really good for kids' brains. For example, according to the NPR story, most of the students of Miami's Coral Way elementary school, which has been offering a rigorous English/Spanish immersion program since 1963, come from low-income families, yet many of them are accepted into the city's best high schools.
I've often wondered what xenoglossophobes think happens in the hundreds of sites around the globe where the entire population is, for political or geographic reasons, bilingual. To pick an example close to (my) home, in Catalonia most natives speak both Catalan and Spanish, the two official languages. It is said--mostly by Catalans--that we are the most intelligent people in all of Spain. If there is any truth in that, it's probably due to the enforced bilingualism. But then the Basques (who speak their own utterly weird language, and Spanish) and the Galicians (who speak a language related to Portuguese, and Spanish) probably maintain their own superiority.
Then there is the Vall d'Aran, a tiny valley high in the Pyrenees, in the northwest corner of Catalonia. Its 7,000 inhabitants have not one, not two, but three official languages. The first is Aranes, a variant of Occitan; the second is Catalan, because the valley is in Catalonia; and the third is Spanish, because Catalonia is in Spain. Xenoglossophobes would assume that the poor Aranese are barely able to walk, much less think, with this linguistic turmoil in their heads. But not at all. The Aranese are proud defenders of their endangered tongue, and insist that it be taught in their schools. In addition, because in winter it snows really hard and the passes into Spain used to stay blocked for months, they all also speak French.
Labels:
Aranes
,
Catalan
,
foreign language instruction
,
foreign languages
,
teaching Spanish
,
xenoglossophobia
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
W Is For Water
My swimming suit didn't have bra cups yet, so I must have been eleven the summer my mother signed me up for swimming lessons at the base of Pichincha, the lively volcano that periodically covered the streets of Quito with a light coat of ash.
It was the rainy season. This meant that every day, shortly after noon, dark clouds would gather overhead, thunder would rumble for a while, and then the heavens would liquefy and fall upon the land.
The class, which met at midday, was composed of plump girls in their late teens who, to me, looked about the same age as my mother. Our teacher, Senor Padilla, a former Olympic swimmer, was short and muscular. He wore a tiny bathing suit, and the rest of his body was covered by a rich pelt of black hair. I didn't know why at the time, but being in that class with those plump girls and hairy Senor Padilla made me uncomfortable.
Not as uncomfortable, however, as being in the ice-cold water of the outdoor pool. On the very first day, after a cursory introduction, Senor Padilla blew his whistle and yelled, "Senoritas, al agua!" There was nothing for it but to jump in, so I did. I felt every muscle contract and my body turn to stone as the waters closed over my head. I surfaced spluttering, my nasal passages burning from the chlorine, and looked up. The dark heights of Pichincha were slowly disappearing under masses of lead-colored clouds. I looked down at the water and saw that it too had grown dark and threatening, along with the sky. I heard the faraway rumble of thunder.
The class ended just as the downpour began. I went home shivering, and with a violent headache from what must have been chlorine-filled sinuses. The altitude of 9350 feet, to which neither my parents nor I had adjusted, probably added to the discomfort. Needless to say, I begged not to go back to the class. Needless to say, I did go back.
Every day, my embarrassment grew as I watched Senor Padilla enjoying himself as he taught, and especially as my unathletic-looking classmates mastered the crawl and went on to the back stroke, the side stroke, the breast stroke, the butterfly. Meanwhile I, frozen and stiff as a board, hadn't even learned to float. If I floated face down, I inhaled chlorine. If I turned onto my back, I saw the dark, leaden, threatening clouds rushing towards Pichincha, and feared I was going to die.
The last day of class finally arrived. Senor Padilla had arranged to exhibit our skills before our loved ones. One by one, my classmates dove in and swam the length of the pool, each in her favorite style. When my turn came, Senor Padilla said that all I had to do was dive and float across the pool.
As I stood shivering at the water's edge, I glanced up towards Pichincha and saw the black clouds galloping overhead. I closed my eyes and threw myself in. Eventually I surfaced, sank, surfaced again and was making my way towards dry land when something bumped against my hip. It was Senor Padilla, who, worried that I was drowning right in front of my parents, had jumped in to save me.
Several weeks later, I went to a different swimming pool. The sun was out, the water was warm, and the pool was almost empty. I got in, turned on my back, looked up at the blue sky, and, since nobody was watching, tried the back stroke. I managed not only to stay afloat, but to cross the pool. Then I turned onto my stomach and did the crawl, the breast stroke, the side stroke, and the butterfly. I couldn't believe it, but it was true: despite the cold, the terror, and the embarrassment, Senor Padilla really had taught me how to swim.
Saturday, October 22, 2011
V Is For Violin, And For Violence
My first violin had tooth marks on the rim, where I had bitten it in a rage. The bow was missing several hairs from being struck on the back of my parents' sofa, and certain pages of my method books retained the marks of crumpling no matter how carefully I later tried to smooth them out.
I was a violent violinist when I was a kid. I hated my violin as if it were a living thing, and wanted to kill it. I wanted to kill it so it would stop making those offending sounds that, week after week and month after month, never seemed to get any better.
Not that the violin had been forced on me. My music career had begun with the piano. But after a year of struggling with fingerings and trying to keep my wrists level with my hands and my fingers curled just so, I thought the violin had to be easier, more rewarding. Besides, studying the violin meant that I would have my father for a teacher.
Why didn't my parents warn me? Perhaps they did, and I didn't listen. So on my tenth birthday, I got a violin, and my first lesson. My father showed me how to tuck the violin under my chin and support its neck with my left hand so the instrument would be parallel to the ground. Then he told me how to hold the bow, and how to draw it across the A string, halfway between bridge and fingerboard, with the hair tilted towards me at the frog and flat on the string when I got to the tip. Less pressure at the frog and more at the tip. This I should do very carefully, over and over, fifteen minutes a day, every day, until my next lesson.
"You mean just drawing the bow across the A string?" I asked.
"Yes. It's very difficult to do right." He lifted my left arm, which by then was pointing dispiritedly towards the ground, and left.
This was well before Suzuki, before the helpful fingering tapes on the fingerboard, the accompanying CDs, and the frivolous idea that playing the violin should be fun. By the end of the second practice session, I was bored out of my mind and longing for the days of the Anna Magdalena Bach piano book, the little Minuets and Sarabandes that actually sounded like regular music.
A year passed. My father pronounced me to have basic talent and a good ear worth cultivating, and raised my daily practice time to an hour. Leaving my mother to enforce the regimen, he went off to earn our keep as a musician. This required him to work quite hard, and in retrospect I can see that expecting him to give me a weekly lesson, like his regular students got, was perhaps too much. So I would go weeks, sometimes months, without a lesson. Occasionally, if he happened to be home while I was practicing, my father would swoop into the room saying "Flat! You're flat! Here, let me show you..." If I was lucky, sometimes these interventions would develop into lessons.
The years passed and, as I advanced, I fell deeper into musical despair. The more I learned about the violin, the more I hated the way I sounded. Having heard the sound of his violin from the day I was conceived, I considered my father's playing the minimum acceptable level of proficiency, so by comparison my own playing seemed beyond disgusting. I was eighteen before I could stand to hear myself.
But by then I also realized what a jealous master the instrument was. I was in college, majoring in Biology and French, and taking violin for one hour of credit--yet practicing for that single credit took as much time as the rest of my courses combined. I played for another two years and then, without thinking too much about it, I put away the violin, the methods books, the music stand. The calluses on my fingers slowly faded, and life rushed in to fill the now-vacant practice hours. My parents had the grace not to make a fuss.
And after that, for years and years I never gave the violin another thought.
Labels:
alphabets
,
music learning
,
violin
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Why I Shop At The Dorset Church Rummage Sale
There are twelve items in my recycled garbage bag: a couple of heavy sweaters and several long-sleeved tees--all of them wool, cashmere, cotton, or silk. All of them bearing brand names that even I am familiar with. I hand the gray-haired lady $30. She gives me change, looks into my eyes, says "thank you so much for coming."
Before I came to Vermont, I had never darkened the door of a vintage shop, much less attended a rummage sale. But--blame the apocalyptic Zeitgeist, or the Vermont ethos, or the fact that the chicken shed has replaced the office as my early-morning destination--I now attend the Dorset Church bi-annual rummage sale religiously.
So does everybody else. In Vermont you can normally drive right to the front door of your venue and park. But for this particular occasion, you sometimes have to park the equivalent of two blocks (there are no blocks in Dorset) away. That tells you something.
It's usually brisk on the morning of the fall sale, and the wily church ladies have set up the tent with the coats, heavy sweaters and ski-wear right next to the (Vermont marble) sidewalk. Indoors there is the "designer room," where cashmere and pristine labels abound; the coat room, the shoe room, the children's room, and a huge room where you can buy dresses, skirts, pants, tops, sheets, blankets, comforters, not to mention clothes for guys, for practically pennies.
The place is so crowded that reflective shopping is out of the question. This is a relief for me, who tend to go into existential crises in a mall. Here the rule is: buy first, think later. For some reason, I don't feel overwhelmed by the crowds, but oddly serene, and wealthy. Though we barely stop to talk, I run into several people I know. One friend is buying wool sweaters that she will "felt" by washing them in hot water and then cut up and sew together into a vest of many colors. Another friend carries her purchases in her arms. "I won't let them give me a bag," she says, referring to the recycled paper or plastic bags that shoppers are offered. Awed by her environmental conscientiousness, I vow to bring my own canvas bags next year.
And there you have the first of my reasons for shopping at the rummage sale: it's environmentally friendly. I'm recycling all that cotton, all those dyes, all that labor. It saves my own resources: I'm keeping myself warm and satisfying the remains of my feminine vanity for a fraction of what I would pay at a regular store. I'm contributing (albeit not a lot, given the prices) to a local charity. I am helping in a small way to make our region self-sufficient.
Finally, there is the issue of who makes the clothes we buy in the stores. My husband's sister, Jodi Cobb, an intrepid photographer for National Geographic, shot a powerful story about slavery in the 21st century. (You can read her post on the subject by clicking: http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2011/archives/21940#more-21940 ) There is nothing I can do about young girls being sold as prostitutes in Eastern Europe. But by limiting my purchase of new goods of uncertain provenance (and aren't all those "made in..." labels inside our sweaters signs of uncertain provenance?) I can minimize the profits of someone who makes his or her living off the skinny backs of six-year-olds. It's a golden opportunity to do a little good in this sad old world.
Before I came to Vermont, I had never darkened the door of a vintage shop, much less attended a rummage sale. But--blame the apocalyptic Zeitgeist, or the Vermont ethos, or the fact that the chicken shed has replaced the office as my early-morning destination--I now attend the Dorset Church bi-annual rummage sale religiously.
So does everybody else. In Vermont you can normally drive right to the front door of your venue and park. But for this particular occasion, you sometimes have to park the equivalent of two blocks (there are no blocks in Dorset) away. That tells you something.
It's usually brisk on the morning of the fall sale, and the wily church ladies have set up the tent with the coats, heavy sweaters and ski-wear right next to the (Vermont marble) sidewalk. Indoors there is the "designer room," where cashmere and pristine labels abound; the coat room, the shoe room, the children's room, and a huge room where you can buy dresses, skirts, pants, tops, sheets, blankets, comforters, not to mention clothes for guys, for practically pennies.
The place is so crowded that reflective shopping is out of the question. This is a relief for me, who tend to go into existential crises in a mall. Here the rule is: buy first, think later. For some reason, I don't feel overwhelmed by the crowds, but oddly serene, and wealthy. Though we barely stop to talk, I run into several people I know. One friend is buying wool sweaters that she will "felt" by washing them in hot water and then cut up and sew together into a vest of many colors. Another friend carries her purchases in her arms. "I won't let them give me a bag," she says, referring to the recycled paper or plastic bags that shoppers are offered. Awed by her environmental conscientiousness, I vow to bring my own canvas bags next year.
And there you have the first of my reasons for shopping at the rummage sale: it's environmentally friendly. I'm recycling all that cotton, all those dyes, all that labor. It saves my own resources: I'm keeping myself warm and satisfying the remains of my feminine vanity for a fraction of what I would pay at a regular store. I'm contributing (albeit not a lot, given the prices) to a local charity. I am helping in a small way to make our region self-sufficient.
Finally, there is the issue of who makes the clothes we buy in the stores. My husband's sister, Jodi Cobb, an intrepid photographer for National Geographic, shot a powerful story about slavery in the 21st century. (You can read her post on the subject by clicking: http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2011/archives/21940#more-21940 ) There is nothing I can do about young girls being sold as prostitutes in Eastern Europe. But by limiting my purchase of new goods of uncertain provenance (and aren't all those "made in..." labels inside our sweaters signs of uncertain provenance?) I can minimize the profits of someone who makes his or her living off the skinny backs of six-year-olds. It's a golden opportunity to do a little good in this sad old world.
Labels:
country living
,
fashion
,
Jodi Cobb
,
slavery
,
sustainable living
,
Vermont
Monday, October 17, 2011
The Lazy Gardener's Guide To World-Class Compost
Here's what you do: forget those instructions about gathering your various compost ingredients, layering them carefully, wetting them down and turning them frequently. Instead, get two or three hens--or six, if you are ambitious--and put them in a shed. If they have access to the outdoors, and they should, an 8'x8' space will accommodate six layers luxuriously. You want your hens to be able to go outside: the air and grass and bugs are good for their bodies and their souls.
You get a couple of bales of hay that is too old to be fed to cows, technically known as "mulch hay," and spread some of it on the floor of the shed. The hens will rejoice in this, pecking at the hay seeds and scratching around until even the longest stems are nicely shredded. This is the beginning of your compost pile.
As the hay in your chicken shed--the term of art is "bedding," or "litter"--becomes soiled, just sprinkle some more hay over it. This will keep the surface clean and free of smell, and the hens don't care what's underneath. Even better, as the bottom layers of hay start to decompose with the help of the chicken poop, they will help to keep your hens' feet warm in the cold weather.
But hay is not all you add to your bedding-cum-compost. All your garden waste--your overgrown zucchini, your spent broccoli plants, your Halloween pumpkins--goes into the hen house. So do your kitchen leftovers, including eggshells, which the hens eat to recycle their calcium. You can throw in coffee grounds and tea leaves, too. Although the hens will not eat them, they make great fertilizer. Your birds will love bits of meat and fat, but bones will attract rodents, so put them into your (now greatly diminished) trash.
Then in the fall, when the garden is finished, you shovel the soiled bedding into your garden cart and dump it on the garden. You will notice that the hay has been shredded, the poop has mostly vanished, and there is a good bit of fine dust: this is the organic fertilizer that your hens have made for you out of the kindness of their hearts, the super-nutritious manna that will give your young plants a terrific start in life next spring.
Since chicken manure is very rich in nitrogen, it needs to age before it comes in contact with plants. I let mine sit and ripen in the empty garden, absorbing rain and sleet and snow, from October to March. If you are in a climate that allows year-round gardening, you will have to pile the soiled bedding somewhere and let it age for several months before using it.
When you've finished dumping the litter on the garden, go back and spread a clean layer of hay on the shed floor. Give the hens a couple of apples, sit and talk with them a while. They have fertilized, turned and shredded your compost for you. Backyard alchemists, they have transmuted your kitchen waste into golden-yolked eggs. They deserve a bit of thanks.
You get a couple of bales of hay that is too old to be fed to cows, technically known as "mulch hay," and spread some of it on the floor of the shed. The hens will rejoice in this, pecking at the hay seeds and scratching around until even the longest stems are nicely shredded. This is the beginning of your compost pile.
As the hay in your chicken shed--the term of art is "bedding," or "litter"--becomes soiled, just sprinkle some more hay over it. This will keep the surface clean and free of smell, and the hens don't care what's underneath. Even better, as the bottom layers of hay start to decompose with the help of the chicken poop, they will help to keep your hens' feet warm in the cold weather.
But hay is not all you add to your bedding-cum-compost. All your garden waste--your overgrown zucchini, your spent broccoli plants, your Halloween pumpkins--goes into the hen house. So do your kitchen leftovers, including eggshells, which the hens eat to recycle their calcium. You can throw in coffee grounds and tea leaves, too. Although the hens will not eat them, they make great fertilizer. Your birds will love bits of meat and fat, but bones will attract rodents, so put them into your (now greatly diminished) trash.
Then in the fall, when the garden is finished, you shovel the soiled bedding into your garden cart and dump it on the garden. You will notice that the hay has been shredded, the poop has mostly vanished, and there is a good bit of fine dust: this is the organic fertilizer that your hens have made for you out of the kindness of their hearts, the super-nutritious manna that will give your young plants a terrific start in life next spring.
Since chicken manure is very rich in nitrogen, it needs to age before it comes in contact with plants. I let mine sit and ripen in the empty garden, absorbing rain and sleet and snow, from October to March. If you are in a climate that allows year-round gardening, you will have to pile the soiled bedding somewhere and let it age for several months before using it.
When you've finished dumping the litter on the garden, go back and spread a clean layer of hay on the shed floor. Give the hens a couple of apples, sit and talk with them a while. They have fertilized, turned and shredded your compost for you. Backyard alchemists, they have transmuted your kitchen waste into golden-yolked eggs. They deserve a bit of thanks.
Labels:
backyard chickens
,
compost
,
sustainable living
,
vegetable gardening
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)



