Monday, July 1, 2013
Blog Bling
It's the one about the use of "like" in Facebook. If you're one of the kind souls who reads me regularly, you probably already saw it last March, and I apologize for sending you back to it. But I've been urged by the BlogHer goddesses to publicize my tiny post all over the www: Facebook, Facebook Fan Page, Twitter, this blog, Google+...
If I were really with it, I would also be spreading the word on LinkedIn, Tumblr, StumbleUpon, Pinterest, YouTube, and who knows what else.
I can't remember how long it took me to write the original post, but it wasn't nearly as long as it's taken to go through the syndication and then the self-promotion process.
I would feel that all of this was "an expense of spirit in a waste of shame," as Shakespeare said of lust, except that with every step I believe that I am keeping up if only with the rear-guard in the fuzzy, misty but implacable world of the www.
Tomorrow, I'm going back to normal. I might even make a drawing.
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Long Books
When I find a book I like, I immediately look for more from that author. Often, as I wander in a daze through the stacks of a local library (nothing puts me in a daze like wandering through library stacks--I can never think of a writer or a title to look for) I use as a criterion, in addition to New Yorker reviews, whether there is more than one book by that author on the shelf. My hermit-like existence prompts me to look for sustained company wherever I find it.
In my long-ago grad studies in French Lit, there were only a couple of women on the reading lists. Since then, I have read lots and lots of women writers. Unfortunately, in sheer output they do not compare to the men. Why didn't Jane Austen write sixty novels, instead of six? Because she was busy making blancmange puddings for her father, which I hope he enjoyed.
As I await for the female equivalent of Dickens (whom I can't stand--such namby-pamby women characters), I revel in the likes of Trollope, Proust, P.G. Wodehouse, Robertson Davies. And now that I'm grown up, I intend to give Balzac another try.
This need for a long-term immersion in another mind means that, try as I might, I cannot really get into contemporary media. I hate magazines that make you hunt pages ahead for the ending to the (inevitably short) article you're reading. I miss the almost-book-length essays in the old black-and-white New Yorker. I detest "side bars," and advertisements that take up text space. I'll leave you to imagine how I feel about web pages with pop-up adds, not to mention Facebook, even-less-to-mention Twitter (though I have accounts in both).
Fortunately, books--big, fat, full-of-print ones with no advertisements--remain. I'm due for another trip to the library soon. What do you recommend?
Monday, March 21, 2011
Here Today...
So true. Somehow we have all gotten the feeling since e-mail became available that to call people up on an impulse is presumptuous. Now, if I call without obtaining prior permission via e-mail, I make sure to ask, the minute I identify myself, "is this a good time?"
Spontaneous, non-business phone calls have gone the way of drop-in visits. Remember those? I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of impromptu visitors who have come to the door in my adult life. But when I was a kid, family and friends of my parents used to drop by all the time.
In Spain, whether the visitor was a family member or a life-long friend, he or she was always ushered into the living room. We were amazed, in our first years in the U.S., when people would follow us into the kitchen, leaning against the counter and chatting away while we made them coffee. In Spain, you could visit your aunt weekly for decades, and never see her kitchen.
I remember certain visitors eliciting some covert eye-rolling on my mother's part. I remember resenting having to interrupt my homework or get off the phone to go into the living room to greet them. But a lot of visits turned into impromptu dinner parties, my mother saying, "Why don't I make some omelettes?" and all of us welcoming the respite from daily routine.
With the entrance of women into the workforce, however, the spontaneous visitor first became endangered, then extinct. What's the use of knocking on someone's door when only a lonely dog will answer? And it would take one heck of a visitor--perhaps an archangel in human form--to pleasantly surprise a woman who, after a day in the office, is trying to hold on to sanity while sauteing onions and supervising the kids' homework. Curiously, some people still say "come see us sometime," but who would be crass enough to take them up on it?
During the long era of phone calls, I fixed many a dinner with the phone jammed between ear and shoulder, the long cord following me from stove to fridge, while on the other end I could hear my caller banging pots and pans in her own kitchen. Now the phone, even with the advent of cordless sets and cell phones, has gone the way of drop-ins.
Instead--who'd have thought it?--we type messages to each other, and a whole edifice of etiquette has sprung up around e-mail, regulating whom to message and how frequently, the appropriateness of forwarding, the rules of attachments. But who knows how long e-mail will last? I hear its death-knell on the pages of Facebook, which has already supplanted blogging for many people.
First there were impromptu visits, then phone chats, then e-mail, then Facebook. This very minute, legions are abandoning Facebook in favor of Twitter, which eventually will itself be deemed slow and cumbersome and replaced by the flash between synapses recorded by implanted devices and instantly conveyed to a preselected list of "friends."
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Longfellow To The Rescue
"If we could read the secret history of our enemies we should find in each man's life sorrow and suffering enough to disarm all hostility."I don't believe I have enemies, or hostility that needs disarming. But often I look at the lives of people around me and think, "what would it be like to feel the way she must feel, able to count on a reliable supply of energy from day to day, to take on projects knowing that her body will see her through them?"
Envy has a nastier edge than what I feel, which is more a longing for other people's seemingly endless supply of energy, and a dissatisfaction with my own wavering limitations.
I know that I am not the only one to feel this way. I can imagine that some people might look at my life from the outside, and feel something akin to envy. But that is because they wouldn't know my "secret history."
We all mostly keep our secret histories to ourselves. It is what social norms demand. People who disclose their "sorrow and suffering" at inappropriate times are rightly shunned as bores. We are much more likely to make friends and have a good time if we put on a brave face and talk about cheerful things.
These social norms are especially stringent on the internet. I don't follow many blogs, but on the ones I have seen writers mostly abstain from whingeing and project a positive, upbeat image. There may be some who do whinge, but I suspect they have few readers.
As for Facebook, could there be a perkier medium? People communicate their dissatisfaction with politics, contemporary culture, and environmental disasters mostly by linking to relevant sites, but these are public issues, not personal sorrow and suffering.
These, as far as I can see, are banished from Facebook, where acceptable topics include parties you've been to, food you've eaten or are about to eat, drinks ditto, trips you've taken, and cute things your children/grandchildren/pets have said or done. The skies over the land of Facebook are singularly unclouded. As for Twitter, everybody knows that birds don't tweet when they're feeling sad.
This is probably just as well. Who wants to read bulletins about people's unrequited loves or career frustrations? But the cumulative effect of Twitter, Facebook and many blogs is to give a false impression that the population consists mostly of people who careen merrily from one fun thing to another.
In all this cheerfulness, there is no room for secret histories, no way for us to sense each other's sorrow and suffering. The only sorrow and suffering we sense is our own, and this increases our feelings of isolation and dissatisfaction.
There are tragedies in people's lives that become apparent on short acquaintance: the death of a child, disabling or disfiguring disease, financial ruin. But we all know plenty of people who have experienced none of this, people whose emotional weather appears to be mostly sunny, with only scattered clouds. People whom we envy.
These are the people that Longfellow is talking about. Because if you probe deep enough, there is in every human life a secret sorrow that is no less piercing for being hidden. We will never know what load of unfulfilled longings and devastating defeats other people carry. We will never glimpse, inside our fellow cocktail-party goers, the weeping child, the cowed teenager, the betrayed spouse.
No matter what we look like, we are all vessels full of unshed tears. This should make us feel less alone in our miseries, but also open our hearts to compassion, and disarm hostility.
![]() |
| Bisou, who has no secret history |
Sunday, May 16, 2010
If I Have To Type Another Password...
I have been trying to leave reviews for a friend's book on the major booksellers' websites, and of course to do that you have to register (invent a password, come up with a username, oops, you're already a member, have you forgotten your password, here, we'll send you an e-mail so you can get a new one, just go to this link and start all over again). Writing a review is nothing compared to all the clicking and making up of names that I instantly forget.
I have been trying to become more active on Facebook--I'm not sure why--and there again have come up with obstacles, such as thumbnails that won't upload (and what am I doing writing phrases like the last one?).
And finally, I have signed up on Twitter, and after many difficulties uploading my profile--caused by Twitter being "overloaded," go figure--am tweeting...which is all, as it turns out, that I have energy for.
Monday, January 12, 2009
Things To Do Before Spring
The Writer Magazine has an on-line column called Web Savvy that I thought I ought to read, but to get access I had to subscribe to the print edition of the magazine. Now I get The Writer every month, and even though I don't find it terribly compelling, I feel obligated to skim it so as not to miss some nugget of writerly wisdom. I should take a look at the January issue before the February one arrives.
And I should make it a practice to read at least one Web Savvy post every day. That's the reason for the subscription in the first place, and it would make me more web literate. Reading a single post every day won't be a big deal.
It was Web Savvy that introduced me to Technorati. I've looked at their site a couple of times, but it's like reading something in a foreign language about concepts from another planet. Still, if I read a little every day, maybe I'll begin to understand it and I'll be able to improve my blog.
Speaking of which, I should also make it a daily practice to check out Problogger, where I learned everything I know about blogging. One thing they recommend over and over is to read other blogs.
Therefore, to the list of blogs that I read because I like them, I should add some blogs about chickens and dogs, since I write about these topics often. And blogs about women's spirituality, too, as well as about simple/frugal/sustainable living. I must keep current on these subjects.
For example, I heard yesterday, on NPR's Speaking of Faith, that the program's website has a blog on the spiritual repercussions of the economic crisis. Can't miss that. Then this morning I heard a feature about Wangari Maathai who got the Nobel Peace prize for encouraging women in Kenya to plant trees. Women, trees, sustainability—what could be closer to my heart? Must find out more. And Julia Alvarez, who lives in Vermont, will be speaking on VPR at noon. Can't forget to listen to her.
Maybe one of these evenings I'll finish the New Yorker article I left open on the coffee table (I think a new issue has arrived since then—I lose count). And I have got to read Nourishing Traditions, the cook-and-nutrition book that, among other things, tells you it's good to eat lots of butter. And speaking of books, it would be fun to read Updike's The Widows of Eastwick, a sequel to The Witches. Maybe the library has it.
But I shouldn't be giving in to the lure of the print media. I'm so hopelessly behind on the electronic kind. For instance, I know what a gadget is, on Blogger, but what is a widget? And Facebook. Not a day goes by that someone doesn't sing its praises. I actually have a Facebook page, but I haven't done anything with it. I don't understand the concept. Is the point of Facebook to boil human experience down to a single sentence? And is Twitter (which I have never seen) the ultimate expression of this trend, so that even words are eliminated and expression is reduced to bird song?
I don't know the answer to any of this, but I'd better find out now, while snow is on the ground. Already the sun doesn't set until after five. Before I know it, it will be time to plant the spinach.
