Sunday, November 4, 2012
My First Buck
Gray sky, gray woods and, at the very edge of the field, clothed in gray and tan, a buck. In the eight years since we moved to Vermont, of the dozens of deer that have grazed our fields and dropped mountains of dog treats on the ground, not a single one has been an antlered buck.
This one is a beauty of sorts. He doesn't have the Audrey Hepburnish litheness of the does, but is as fat and stocky and glossy as a Jersey cow, with a neck the size of my torso (well, almost), and a lovely but seemingly impractical crown of horns with three spikes on each side.
I waited for him to go back into the woods before I took the dogs out, and while I was throwing balls for them, gun shots exploded from the direction in which the buck had disappeared. Hunting season doesn't start until next weekend, so I hope that what I heard was target practice.
But sooner or later, somebody will get my buck. The fact that he was the first one in eight years to venture out into our field doesn't speak well for his camouflage I.Q., and perhaps it won't be a tragedy if he doesn't live to pass that trait on to next spring's crop of fawns.
Whoever kills him, though, had better eat him. If you kill it, you should eat it. And in my book, getting your meat through hunting (if you're a good hunter, that is, and hit your mark) is far superior on humanitarian grounds than buying steaks from feedlot-raised cows.
Before somebody shoots him, my buck will have had a fine life, growing up next to his mother, finding good things to eat in the woods, going down to the trout stream to drink at dusk. And the hunter will have high-quality meat, free of antibiotics and other horrors.
Next weekend our village will hold the annual game dinner. The fire hall will be redolent with the smell of cooking meat: bear, moose, deer, and who knows what else. We usually attend these dinners, to show community spirit, and my husband eats some of everything. I, on the other hand, despite all my convictions, confine myself to pie.
Thursday, October 13, 2011
Why Vermont Should Change Its Name With The Seasons
During the fall woodland pyrotechnics, there is precious little green around, so the state name should change to Rougemont, or Montorange, shifting to Beigemont during stick season. After the first snow, Beigemont would become Montblanc. In March, the state should be known as Montboue.
And when spring finally comes, and lilacs burst into bloom, Vermont should be called Montlilas. Which is rather pretty, I think.
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
The Seasons Of Fall
Around here, fall is a season of extremes. It starts with the hillsides going up in flames of red, orange and yellow. And it ends with them the color of cinders, as if they had burned themselves out. Vermonters call this phase of fall “stick season,” because all you see is sticks—no leaves, no snow, no green, red, yellow, orange or white. Just sticks.
“Sere” is an Old English word I love. It means parched, wizened, dry. That's Vermont right now—sere, not for lack of rain, but for lack of color. It's the monochromatic time. Everything is in tones of gray and beige—the sky, the trees, the hills.
As you drive down the country roads all sorts of things that were once hidden behind the greenery are revealed: old barns, new houses, mares with their half-grown colts, strange-looking cows, and, everywhere, wood piles.
Around four thirty, through the silhouettes of the leafless trees, you can see the sunset blaze.
It's not really cold yet. But we know it soon will be, so we get out the winter clothes. The roads are clear, but we know they soon won't be, so a last frenzy of social activity breaks out, “while we don't have to worry about getting there.” It's the time of fire-hall game dinners.
I should bring in those green pumpkins I left to ripen in the last warmth of the autumn sun, before a truly hard freeze turns them to mush.