Remember “surreal”? People
used to say it all the time, mostly in situations that had nothing to do with
limp watches or dreamlike events.
“The service here is so slow, it’s surreal!”
Now you hardly ever hear
“surreal” anymore. It’s been replaced by “iconic,” which again is used in ways
that have nothing to do with those gilded Russian angels, saints and madonnas
painted on wood.
According to the dictionary,
an icon, in the figurative sense, is “a sign or representation that stands for
its object by virtue of a resemblance or analogy to it.” So a map is an icon of
sorts, because it stands for and in fact resembles a geographic region.
Also in a figurative sense,
an icon is a person who is especially revered or adored: Lady Gaga is a pop
music icon. If you try, you can imagine her with a spiritual look in her eye
and a veil on her head, its folds rigid and symmetrical, the whole framed in
gold and illumined by flickering candles.
It is in this sense that
“icon” and “iconic” are now being used ad
nauseam. And it’s not just people who
are iconic: Secretariat was an iconic horse, Rin Tin Tin an iconic German
Shepherd. Recently I even heard someone on public radio refer to something as
“an iconic moment,” which stretches figurativeness farther than I can follow. (I
usually refer to NPR as such an icon of media excellence that I’m allowed a
tiny criticism here.)
It’s not so much that I
object to the meaning of a word expanding to designate objects it didn’t
originally refer to. I object to the overuse that dilutes and enfeebles it and
turns it into a minor irritant, like a finger poking an old bruise. My spouse encourages
me to become more tolerant, but I guess I’m just an icon of linguistic hypersensitivity.
And then there’s “awesome,”
as in “Would you like ketchup with your fries?”
“Yes, please.”
“Awesome.”
Really? I thought that “awesome”
might describe Moses’ experience conversing with God on Mount Sinai, or the
feeling one gets standing on the rim of the Grand Canyon—reverence mixed with admiration
and a dash of fear. But no.
“I’ll pick you up at five,
then.”
“Awesome.”
Patience, according to Saint
Teresa, obtains all things, so if I can grit my teeth a while longer, “iconic”
and “awesome” will probably go the way of “surreal.” There is one word,
however, whose figurative use will likely go on and on, because it can mean
almost anything that the speaker likes: cool.
At first I thought that my
generation had invented it. Then I remembered “cool jazz,” the calm, restrained
jazz style of the late 1940s. Some believe that originally it referred to the behavior
of African slaves, who had to conceal their anger beneath a veneer of detachment.
Which is better, I wonder, “cool”
or “awesome”? Whom would you rather marry, who would be more likely to treat
you well and stick by you in the long term-- someone cool or someone awesome? Awesomeness
is warmer, which might make it the more desirable trait in a spouse.
Which reminds me that,
contrary to logic, “hot” is also a positive trait, though a partner who once
incarnated hotness may become more cool (and not in a good way) over time.
Isn’t language surreal?
I love this. Every time the word awesome leaves my lips—and it does—I shudder. It just lives in my vocabulary, and I don't know how it got there. Cool is still with me too, and I found myself using it an unusual amount one particular day, which perplexed me. Iconic? Not so much.
ReplyDeleteYou are allowed to say awesome, as long as you shudder.
DeleteI rarely say awesome, as it never really caught on here. Though I probably write it in comments on a blog. Cool, I do say now, though never said it when it was first cool to say.
ReplyDeleteI would have thought you could definitely be both hot and cool. Indeed, it seems to be almost compulsory to be hot to be cool.